Clarification on Standard Written Orders

Published in Government Relations on April 16, 2024

Ronda BuhrmesterRecently, the DME MACs released a Dear Physician Letter that clarified language on a standard written order (SWO) specifically related to CPAP masks. While the article was great news being welcomed by the industry, it also initiated additional conversation for other PAP supplies such as interfaces and tubing.

A SWO can have all the CPAP supplies listed separately (itemized). The descriptions of the items can be generic such as “CPAP mask”, this is applicable to either a full face mask or a nasal mask. The same SWO can have “tubing” listed to refer to either standard or heated tubing. The interfaces can also be a generic description.

The important pieces of information to be aware of when working with suppliers offering PAP supplies is making sure the SWO is not stating “CPAP supplies.” While the supplier can dispense with this type of order, the supplier cannot submit the claim for payment.  The SWO needs to be itemized. 

The other important piece of information is knowing that the interfaces would be listed separately because the quantities allowed each month are different. While both nasal replacement interfaces and full face replacement interfaces can be listed on the same SWO, the monthly allowed quantities are different. 

One last important piece of information is knowing the effective date of this change. The medical directors with the DME MACs have stated the guidance is for claims reviewed on or after February 1, 2024.

Even though this is a big win for our industry, we need to be mindful and not take advantage of the system. We can all agree the DME industry doesn’t need any more black eyes and we would not want this change reversed.

In summary, applicability is to all PAP supplies: The Dear Physician letter was intentionally written to address the issue of “mask swapping” only, an issue that industry stakeholders and the American Academy of Sleep Medicine asked the DME MACs to address in a recent “white paper.” PAP supplies, when separately billable, should be listed separately on the order. Two examples illustrate acceptable versus unacceptable orders for supplies:

  • Acceptable: “Tubing, Filter” – The DME MACs would allow this general description of the items, recognizing that the supplier’s knowledge of the base equipment dispensed, and patient medical need would dictate the type of tubing (e.g., standard vs heated) and filter (e.g., permanent vs disposable).
  • Unacceptable: “CPAP Supplies” – This would be considered inconsistent with CMS’ instructions to list separately billable items on the SWO.

Reach out to Ronda Buhrmester, Sr. Director of Payer Relations and Reimbursement for questions.


TAGS

  1. reimbursement
  2. respiratory

From Our Experts

The Return of Competitive Bidding thumbnail The Return of Competitive Bidding The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) appear to be laying the groundwork for another round of the Competitive Bidding Program (CBP). While full implementation will take a couple of years, an official announcement is expected this summer—potentially as early as July. Out With The Old RAC, In With The New thumbnail Out With The Old RAC, In With The New On April 28, 2025, CMS awarded Cotiviti GOV Services LLC, the new RAC Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) Region 3, 4, and 5 contracts. RAC Region 3 includes the following Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) jurisdictions: JJ, JM, and JN. RAC Region 4 includes jurisdictions: JE, JF, and JL. And RAC Region 5 includes jurisdictions: JA, JB, JC, JD, as well as the HH/H MACs: J6, J15, JK, and JM. Iowa Leads the Charge! All Four Representatives Back H.R. 2005—Will Your State Step Up? thumbnail Iowa Leads the Charge! All Four Representatives Back H.R. 2005—Will Your State Step Up? At VGM Group, Inc. we have the pleasure of serving our members and partners throughout the country.  One of the many ways we do this is through legislative advocacy, working with our partners to create a more equitable and effective healthcare system. All our VGM units are dedicated to advancing our partners' businesses, streamlining operations, and working every day to enhance reimbursement for the quality in-home healthcare our industry provides all people. Mike Hamilton Of ADMEA Honored With The Mal Mixon Advocate Award thumbnail Mike Hamilton Of ADMEA Honored With The Mal Mixon Advocate Award Last week, during the 2025 AAHomecare Washington Legislative Conference, Mike Hamilton, Executive Director of ADMEA, was honored with the prestigious Mal Mixon Advocate Award. VGM Senior Leaders Engage in Advocacy at AAHomecare Legislative Conference thumbnail VGM Senior Leaders Engage in Advocacy at AAHomecare Legislative Conference This week, VGM leaders attended the AAHomecare Legislative Conference in Washington, D.C., a premier event dedicated to advancing healthcare policy and advocacy. AAHomecare provided attendees with valuable insights, equipping them with key discussion points and strategies for effective meetings with legislators. Champion of Change: Paula Vineyard of Elana Health & Loop Medical Leads Healthcare Advocacy in West Virginia thumbnail Champion of Change: Paula Vineyard of Elana Health & Loop Medical Leads Healthcare Advocacy in West Virginia On Thursday, May 8, Paula Vineyard, owner of Elana Health & Loop Medical, took a pivotal step in healthcare advocacy by hosting a meeting with Tyler Ohrn, Field Representative for Congresswoman Carol Miller of West Virginia's First District. The hour-long discussion centered on the pressing need for congressional support of H.R. 2005. Manufacturer Survey On Tariffs thumbnail Manufacturer Survey On Tariffs The American Association for Homecare and VGM Group are seeking valuable insights from durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS) manufacturers and vendor partners regarding tariffs imposed on certain countries. Key Payers Denied Your Application Citing Their Network Is Closed – Now What? thumbnail Key Payers Denied Your Application Citing Their Network Is Closed – Now What? This experience has increasingly become one of the most common questions we receive from our provider members as more and more payers move to narrow their provider networks. The reasons payers seek to narrow their networks are simple. Payers are highly motivated to achieve their goals while doing less work and are not required to allow providers into their networks unless there is a patient access issue. For those of you fortunate enough to be a part of a narrow network, this may not be much of