VGM & ASSOCIATESHealthcare MSO
Full Menu Search

CMS files the Proposed Rule that sheds light on the next round of the Competitive Bidding Program

Published in Government Relations on July 01, 2025

On June 30, 2025, CMS filed the anticipated Proposed Rule that includes updates to the Competitive Bidding Program (CBP). Public comments are due 60 days from June 30, 2025.  

Below is a high-level summary of the rule. It is critical to note that, according to the Proposed Rule Fact Sheet dated June 30, 2025, CMS has stated that they have not announced the specific product categories they are bidding or the specific timeframe for the next competition. Those specifics will be forthcoming in a future CMS announcement. 

Proposed Rule Highlights: 

Products Redefined And Recategorized For Potential Inclusion 

  • Ostomy, tracheostomy, and urological supplies (Definitions were revised to categorize each as medical equipment and thus subject to CBP inclusion). 
  • Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) and insulin pumps (reimbursed on a bundled monthly rental basis for both CB and non-CB areas and reclassified under the frequent and substantial servicing payment category). 

Remote Item Delivery (RID) CBP – Two RID CBP options proposed for a given product category:  

  • Establish one nationwide RID CBP. 
  • Establish multiple RID CBPs covering different regions of the country. 

Accreditation 

  • Require DME suppliers to get reaccredited annually instead of every three years 

SPA Calculation 

  • Revise the lead item SPA calculation to use the 75th percentile of winning bids for the lead item. 
  • Revise the ratio for non-lead items in a product category to be based on the 2015 fee schedule rate for each specific area instead of the average of the 2015 fee schedule rate for all areas. 

Contract Award Determinations 

  • Revise how CMS determines the number of contracts to award by using supplier utilization information for product categories included in prior rounds and current supplier utilization for new product categories. 

SPA Increase 

Allow for an annual increase to SPAs to account for inflation for multiyear contracts. 

Bid Limits And Conditions For Awarding Contracts If Savings Are Not Expected 

  • Items included for the first time: the bid limits would be the amounts otherwise paid for the items. 
  • Previously included items: the bid limits would be the most recent SPA for the items plus 10 percent. If it has been more than a year since the SPA was last in effect, the inflation-adjusted SPA plus 10 percent. 
  • In no event would the bid limit be allowed to exceed the unadjusted fee schedule amount. 

Financial Documentation Changes 

  • Remove requirement to submit a tax return extract, income statement, balance sheet, or statement of cash flows. 
  • Continue requiring submission of a credit report with a numerical credit score and/or rating from one of the four approved credit reporting agencies during the bid window, and by the CDRD if the supplier wants to be eligible for the process for reviewing covered documents. 
  • Continue using a five-tier scoring system in the evaluation of the credit report with a numerical credit score and/or rating, which will be utilized to establish a financial score. 
  • Cease using supplier financial scores when determining the capacity to assign to each supplier to meet projected beneficiary demand. 
  • Require suppliers attest that they meet the small supplier threshold in the DMEPOS Bidding System (DBidS), or any successor system, if applicable. 

New Contract Clause 

  • Addition of a new clause allowing CMS to unilaterally terminate or modify supplier contracts if certain conditions are met due to a PHE allowing CMS to revert to the general fee-for-service program requirements. 

The VGM Government Relations team will continue to analyze, develop action items, and provide updates as they become available. 

Get Connected

Stay up-to-date on the latest resources and news provided by VGM & Associates.

Sign Up for Email

From Our Experts

WEBINAR: Navigating New CMS Guidelines: Unlocking Opportunities in NIPPV and RAD Coverage for COPD Care thumbnail WEBINAR: Navigating New CMS Guidelines: Unlocking Opportunities in NIPPV and RAD Coverage for COPD Care The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has revised the NCD for Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) in the home setting for treating Chronic Respiratory Failure (CRF) due to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The changes aim to establish clear coverage policies for devices such as Respiratory Assist Devices (RADs) and home mechanical ventilators (HMVs), potentially expanding access to these critical therapies for eligible patients. Adapting to new CMS guidelin Bipartisan Medicare O&P Bill Introduced thumbnail Bipartisan Medicare O&P Bill Introduced In a timely move ahead of next week's NAAOP Legislative Fly-In, a bipartisan group of lawmakers introduced the Medicare Orthotics and Prosthetics Patient-Centered Care Act, a bill aimed at improving access to high-quality orthotic and prosthetic care for Medicare beneficiaries. The Patient-Centered Care Act seeks to address critical gaps in Medicare coverage for orthotic and prosthetic (O&P) services. Under current rules, beneficiaries may receive devices without the necessary clinical services Proposed Rule Suggests Significant Change To Accreditation Process thumbnail Proposed Rule Suggests Significant Change To Accreditation Process The recently released proposed rule CMS-1828-P contains a significant change that could reshape how suppliers navigate accreditation. The rule proposes a major change that would require suppliers to be surveyed and reaccredited annually instead of the current three (3) year cadence. This proposal raises substantial questions about both operational feasibility and cost implications. August Of Action: Your Chance To Connect With Congress thumbnail August Of Action: Your Chance To Connect With Congress It's time to take advantage of August Of Action—a perfect opportunity to make your voice heard. Every summer, federal legislators return to their home states during the Congressional recess. While it gives them a break from Washington D.C., it's primarily a time for them to connect with constituents like you. HR1 Passes House, Advances to President Trump's Desk for Signature thumbnail HR1 Passes House, Advances to President Trump's Desk for Signature After extensive negotiations and partisan debate, the House has officially passed HR1, clearing the path for the bill to be signed into law by President Donald Trump. The legislation, which aims to reduce federal healthcare expenditures, contains several provisions that may impact the durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS) industry. Senate Narrowly Passes HR1, Sending It Back to House for Final Approval thumbnail Senate Narrowly Passes HR1, Sending It Back to House for Final Approval President Donald Trump's sweeping legislative package, formally titled the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act, now referred to as HR1., cleared the Senate today in a dramatic 51–50 vote, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. The bill now returns to the House, where lawmakers must decide whether to adopt the Senate's revised version or negotiate further changes before it can reach the president's desk. Several Prominent Medicaid Provisions in Senate's Budget Bill Deemed in Violation of Byrd Rule thumbnail Several Prominent Medicaid Provisions in Senate's Budget Bill Deemed in Violation of Byrd Rule Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough advised this week that multiple Medicaid provisions in the Senate's reconciliation bill would violate Senate procedure by violating the Byrd Rule. The Byrd Rule is a Senate-specific procedural process that allows Senators to prevent or block inclusion of extraneous provisions in reconciliation bills. Other provisions are still under review. Evaluating the Value of a Payer Contract thumbnail Evaluating the Value of a Payer Contract In our last article, Key Payers Denied Your Application Citing Their Network Is Closed – Now What?, we discussed strategies for addressing payer contracting denials due to a closed network. As indicated, this process can be an extremely time-consuming exercise with no guarantees and mixed results. Below are a few things to consider as you evaluate whether a contract is worth the extra effort.

Give your business an advantage over the competition.

Become a Member