DME is No Longer Exempt from Sales Tax in South Carolina

Published in Government Relations on August 02, 2024

DME providers in South Carolina (SC) have been exempt from paying sales tax to the state of SC since 2007, provided that the items received by a patient 1) are paid for by either the funds of Medicare of South Carolina Medicaid, 2) are sold by a provider who holds a South Carolina retail sales license and 3) are provided by a supplier whose principal place of business is located in South Carolina, and 4) meet the definition of DME. The language of that tax exemption can be found in S.C. code 12-36-2120(74).

In a June 26, 2024 ruling, the Supreme Court of South Carolina determined that the provision which exempts DME from being subject to sales tax in SC to be unconstitutional, arguing that the language of the original sales tax exemption was unfair and discriminatory against interstate commerce. Under the existing exemption language, out-of-state providers were required to pay sales tax while in-state providers were not. The Court found that the existing exemption language violated the Commerce Clause, and therefore should be stricken and removed altogether from the current code.

Some important takeaways for providers who offer products and services in South Carolina include:

  1. DME sales after June 26, 2024 are subject to sales tax, and all providers, in state or out of state, will need to collect and/or remit sales tax (6%) to the state on the DME sales transactions in South Carolina which occur after that date.
  2. The SC Supreme Court said they are open to allowing a new sales tax exemption to be passed and implemented in the state, it would just have to be worded differently than the previous language that was just voided. Working alongside SC providers and other industry stakeholders, VGM can certainly assist in drafting new tax exemption language in the hopes of getting it through the legislative process and ultimately passed and implemented. That process will take some time (possibly 1-2 years).
  3. Providers who are based outside of South Carolina, and who have been paying taxes all along, could be eligible for a refund from the state of SC. In their ruling and subsequent informational letter, the SC Supreme Court affirmed a circuit court’s previous decision to issue refunds to out-of-state providers who had paid sales tax into the state on their DME sales. Providers interested in requesting a refund can use Form ST-14 to initiate that process.

The removal of the tax exemption for DME will certainly impact DME providers who do business in South Carolina. We will strive to get a new exemption established going forward. In the meantime, providers can certainly have discussions with their payer sources, including Medicaid, Medicaid MCOs, private payers, etc. regarding what the removal of the exemption means to their business and what needs to happen to offset the impact of this change. If providers can’t afford to absorb the additional costs incurred by this change, they may need to request a fee schedule or process adjustments to offset these additional costs.

VGM will continue to monitor this change and will update you regarding any additional changes or information that comes to light regarding the removal of the sales tax exemption for DME in South Carolina. Additional information regarding this topic can also be found in Informational Letter 24-10.


TAGS

  1. billing & reimbursement
  2. dmepos
  3. regulatory
  4. vgm government

From Our Experts

Featuring Two Champions Of Change: Robert Beard of YD Home Medical & Rob Minicucci Jr. of Health System Services thumbnail Featuring Two Champions Of Change: Robert Beard of YD Home Medical & Rob Minicucci Jr. of Health System Services Today, we're proud to spotlight two outstanding durable medical equipment (DME) champions whose advocacy efforts are making a meaningful difference: Robert Beard of YD Home Medical of Alabama and Rob Minicucci Jr. of Health System Services of New York. These individuals took time out of their busy schedules to personally connect with elected officials, demonstrating how local action can spark national change. Survey: Share Your Thoughts on Proposed Accreditation Rule Changes thumbnail Survey: Share Your Thoughts on Proposed Accreditation Rule Changes CQRC, VGM, and AAHomecare are requesting your feedback on a new proposed rule that could significantly impact accreditation procedures. Under the proposal, accreditation organizations would be required to conduct site visits every year—a major shift from the current once-every-three-years schedule. WEBINAR: Navigating New CMS Guidelines: Unlocking Opportunities in NIPPV and RAD Coverage for COPD Care thumbnail WEBINAR: Navigating New CMS Guidelines: Unlocking Opportunities in NIPPV and RAD Coverage for COPD Care The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has revised the NCD for Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) in the home setting for treating Chronic Respiratory Failure (CRF) due to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The changes aim to establish clear coverage policies for devices such as Respiratory Assist Devices (RADs) and home mechanical ventilators (HMVs), potentially expanding access to these critical therapies for eligible patients. Adapting to new CMS guidelin Bipartisan Medicare O&P Bill Introduced thumbnail Bipartisan Medicare O&P Bill Introduced In a timely move ahead of next week's NAAOP Legislative Fly-In, a bipartisan group of lawmakers introduced the Medicare Orthotics and Prosthetics Patient-Centered Care Act, a bill aimed at improving access to high-quality orthotic and prosthetic care for Medicare beneficiaries. The Patient-Centered Care Act seeks to address critical gaps in Medicare coverage for orthotic and prosthetic (O&P) services. Under current rules, beneficiaries may receive devices without the necessary clinical services Proposed Rule Suggests Significant Change To Accreditation Process thumbnail Proposed Rule Suggests Significant Change To Accreditation Process The recently released proposed rule CMS-1828-P contains a significant change that could reshape how suppliers navigate accreditation. The rule proposes a major change that would require suppliers to be surveyed and reaccredited annually instead of the current three (3) year cadence. This proposal raises substantial questions about both operational feasibility and cost implications. August Of Action: Your Chance To Connect With Congress thumbnail August Of Action: Your Chance To Connect With Congress It's time to take advantage of August Of Action—a perfect opportunity to make your voice heard. Every summer, federal legislators return to their home states during the Congressional recess. While it gives them a break from Washington D.C., it's primarily a time for them to connect with constituents like you. HR1 Passes House, Advances to President Trump's Desk for Signature thumbnail HR1 Passes House, Advances to President Trump's Desk for Signature After extensive negotiations and partisan debate, the House has officially passed HR1, clearing the path for the bill to be signed into law by President Donald Trump. The legislation, which aims to reduce federal healthcare expenditures, contains several provisions that may impact the durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS) industry. CMS files the Proposed Rule that sheds light on the next round of the Competitive Bidding Program thumbnail CMS files the Proposed Rule that sheds light on the next round of the Competitive Bidding Program On June 30, 2025, CMS filed the anticipated Proposed Rule that includes updates to the Competitive Bidding Program (CBP). Public comments are due 60 days from June 30, 2025. Below is a high-level summary of the rule. It is critical to note that, according to the Proposed Rule Fact Sheet dated June 30, 2025, CMS has stated that they have not announced the specific product categories they are bidding or the specific timeframe for the next competition. Those specifics will be forthcoming in a fu