Updates to Orders in the Standard Documentation Requirements

Published in Government Relations on January 02, 2020

From the Desk of Ronda Buhrmester:

Remember the final rule for ESRD/DMEPOS reference number CMS-1713-F that included changes to order requirements? While there was speculation as to what the ruling meant, we now have the final answer. The Standard Documentation Requirements (SDR) has been updated with the updates being effective January 1, 2020.

There are now two types of orders and 1 new acronym, standard written order (SWO) and Written Order Prior to Delivery (WOPD). Below is the information that can be found in the SDR:

STANDARD WRITTEN ORDER (SWO)
A SWO must be communicated to the supplier prior to claim submission. For certain items of DMEPOS, a written order is required prior to delivery (WOPD) of the item(s) to the beneficiary (see below).

A SWO must contain all of the following elements:

  • Beneficiary's name or Medicare Beneficiary Identifier (MBI). The beneficiary’s name is needed to verify the MBI.
  • Order Date, which means the date the referral was communicated to the supplier.
  • General description of the item
    • The description can be either a general description (e.g., wheelchair or hospital bed), a HCPCS code, a HCPCS code narrative, or a brand name/model number. The description needs to be detailed. If it’s genereic, the details must be in the medical record.
    • For equipment - In addition to the description of the base item, the SWO may include all concurrently ordered options, accessories or additional features that are separately billed or require an upgraded code. List each separately.
    • For supplies – In addition to the description of the base item, the DMEPOS order/prescription may include all concurrently ordered supplies that are separately billed. List each separately.
  • Quantity to be dispensed, if applicable. This applies to supply-type items, not DME.
  • Treating Practitioner Name or NPI. Legible identifiers still apply, so get the printed name.
  • Treating practitioner's signature

The SWO can be completed by the supplier. The treating practitioner needs to just review it and add their signature.

WRITTEN ORDERS PRIOR TO DELIVERY (WOPD)
A WOPD is a completed SWO that is communicated to the DMEPOS supplier before delivery of the item(s).

Pursuant to Final Rule 1713 (84 Fed. Reg Vol 217), CMS may select DMEPOS items appearing on the Master List of DMEPOS Items potentially subject to a Face-to-Face Encounter and WOPD requirement and include them on a Required List.

The Required List will be comprised of:
  • Statutorily required DMEPOS items such as Power Mobility Devices (PMDs); and
  • Additional DMEPOS items selected by CMS appearing on the Required List.

Items appearing on the Required List are subject to the face-to-face encounter and WOPD requirements. The required list will be released around March.

CMS and the DME MACs will post on their websites the Required List of the selected HCPCS codes, once published through the Federal Register Notice, and the Required List will be periodically updated.

Note that the face-to-face encounter and WOPD requirements are statutorily required for PMDs, and in accordance with this statutory obligation, both will continue to be required and will be included in any future publications of the Required List.

The date of the WOPD shall be on or before the date of delivery.

A WOPD must be completed within six (6) months after the required face-to-face encounter. PMDs no longer have the 45-day rule.

For PMDs, following the face-to-face encounter, the treating practitioner must complete the WOPD of the item pursuant to 1834(a)(1)(E)(iv).

I would like to explain the general description in more detail, specifically related to CPAP masks, because this has been an area that is both challenging and scrutinized in audits. According to what we have learned, the order can state “mask or CPAP mask.” However, the type of mask must be supported in the medical record (nasal mask or full-face mask). Suppliers struggle getting correct information documented within the medical record by the physician currently, so it will be tough to get the type of mask documented within the medical record. The best practice is to continue to indicate the type of mask on the order.

Click here to read the current Standard Documentation Requirements. Also, please note that the best practice is to continue gathering the necessary elements on the written orders (do not change orders).

Stay tuned for more information as we learn more.

Please reach out with questions or comments to Ronda Buhrmester at ronda.buhrmester@vgm.com.


TAGS

  1. billing & reimbursement
  2. vgm government

From Our Experts

The Return of Competitive Bidding thumbnail The Return of Competitive Bidding The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) appear to be laying the groundwork for another round of the Competitive Bidding Program (CBP). While full implementation will take a couple of years, an official announcement is expected this summer—potentially as early as July. Out With The Old RAC, In With The New thumbnail Out With The Old RAC, In With The New On April 28, 2025, CMS awarded Cotiviti GOV Services LLC, the new RAC Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) Region 3, 4, and 5 contracts. RAC Region 3 includes the following Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) jurisdictions: JJ, JM, and JN. RAC Region 4 includes jurisdictions: JE, JF, and JL. And RAC Region 5 includes jurisdictions: JA, JB, JC, JD, as well as the HH/H MACs: J6, J15, JK, and JM. Iowa Leads the Charge! All Four Representatives Back H.R. 2005—Will Your State Step Up? thumbnail Iowa Leads the Charge! All Four Representatives Back H.R. 2005—Will Your State Step Up? At VGM Group, Inc. we have the pleasure of serving our members and partners throughout the country.  One of the many ways we do this is through legislative advocacy, working with our partners to create a more equitable and effective healthcare system. All our VGM units are dedicated to advancing our partners' businesses, streamlining operations, and working every day to enhance reimbursement for the quality in-home healthcare our industry provides all people. Mike Hamilton Of ADMEA Honored With The Mal Mixon Advocate Award thumbnail Mike Hamilton Of ADMEA Honored With The Mal Mixon Advocate Award Last week, during the 2025 AAHomecare Washington Legislative Conference, Mike Hamilton, Executive Director of ADMEA, was honored with the prestigious Mal Mixon Advocate Award. VGM Senior Leaders Engage in Advocacy at AAHomecare Legislative Conference thumbnail VGM Senior Leaders Engage in Advocacy at AAHomecare Legislative Conference This week, VGM leaders attended the AAHomecare Legislative Conference in Washington, D.C., a premier event dedicated to advancing healthcare policy and advocacy. AAHomecare provided attendees with valuable insights, equipping them with key discussion points and strategies for effective meetings with legislators. Champion of Change: Paula Vineyard of Elana Health & Loop Medical Leads Healthcare Advocacy in West Virginia thumbnail Champion of Change: Paula Vineyard of Elana Health & Loop Medical Leads Healthcare Advocacy in West Virginia On Thursday, May 8, Paula Vineyard, owner of Elana Health & Loop Medical, took a pivotal step in healthcare advocacy by hosting a meeting with Tyler Ohrn, Field Representative for Congresswoman Carol Miller of West Virginia's First District. The hour-long discussion centered on the pressing need for congressional support of H.R. 2005. Manufacturer Survey On Tariffs thumbnail Manufacturer Survey On Tariffs The American Association for Homecare and VGM Group are seeking valuable insights from durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS) manufacturers and vendor partners regarding tariffs imposed on certain countries. Key Payers Denied Your Application Citing Their Network Is Closed – Now What? thumbnail Key Payers Denied Your Application Citing Their Network Is Closed – Now What? This experience has increasingly become one of the most common questions we receive from our provider members as more and more payers move to narrow their provider networks. The reasons payers seek to narrow their networks are simple. Payers are highly motivated to achieve their goals while doing less work and are not required to allow providers into their networks unless there is a patient access issue. For those of you fortunate enough to be a part of a narrow network, this may not be much of