Updates to Orders in the Standard Documentation Requirements

Published in Government Relations on January 02, 2020

From the Desk of Ronda Buhrmester:

Remember the final rule for ESRD/DMEPOS reference number CMS-1713-F that included changes to order requirements? While there was speculation as to what the ruling meant, we now have the final answer. The Standard Documentation Requirements (SDR) has been updated with the updates being effective January 1, 2020.

There are now two types of orders and 1 new acronym, standard written order (SWO) and Written Order Prior to Delivery (WOPD). Below is the information that can be found in the SDR:

STANDARD WRITTEN ORDER (SWO)
A SWO must be communicated to the supplier prior to claim submission. For certain items of DMEPOS, a written order is required prior to delivery (WOPD) of the item(s) to the beneficiary (see below).

A SWO must contain all of the following elements:

  • Beneficiary's name or Medicare Beneficiary Identifier (MBI). The beneficiary’s name is needed to verify the MBI.
  • Order Date, which means the date the referral was communicated to the supplier.
  • General description of the item
    • The description can be either a general description (e.g., wheelchair or hospital bed), a HCPCS code, a HCPCS code narrative, or a brand name/model number. The description needs to be detailed. If it’s genereic, the details must be in the medical record.
    • For equipment - In addition to the description of the base item, the SWO may include all concurrently ordered options, accessories or additional features that are separately billed or require an upgraded code. List each separately.
    • For supplies – In addition to the description of the base item, the DMEPOS order/prescription may include all concurrently ordered supplies that are separately billed. List each separately.
  • Quantity to be dispensed, if applicable. This applies to supply-type items, not DME.
  • Treating Practitioner Name or NPI. Legible identifiers still apply, so get the printed name.
  • Treating practitioner's signature

The SWO can be completed by the supplier. The treating practitioner needs to just review it and add their signature.

WRITTEN ORDERS PRIOR TO DELIVERY (WOPD)
A WOPD is a completed SWO that is communicated to the DMEPOS supplier before delivery of the item(s).

Pursuant to Final Rule 1713 (84 Fed. Reg Vol 217), CMS may select DMEPOS items appearing on the Master List of DMEPOS Items potentially subject to a Face-to-Face Encounter and WOPD requirement and include them on a Required List.

The Required List will be comprised of:
  • Statutorily required DMEPOS items such as Power Mobility Devices (PMDs); and
  • Additional DMEPOS items selected by CMS appearing on the Required List.

Items appearing on the Required List are subject to the face-to-face encounter and WOPD requirements. The required list will be released around March.

CMS and the DME MACs will post on their websites the Required List of the selected HCPCS codes, once published through the Federal Register Notice, and the Required List will be periodically updated.

Note that the face-to-face encounter and WOPD requirements are statutorily required for PMDs, and in accordance with this statutory obligation, both will continue to be required and will be included in any future publications of the Required List.

The date of the WOPD shall be on or before the date of delivery.

A WOPD must be completed within six (6) months after the required face-to-face encounter. PMDs no longer have the 45-day rule.

For PMDs, following the face-to-face encounter, the treating practitioner must complete the WOPD of the item pursuant to 1834(a)(1)(E)(iv).

I would like to explain the general description in more detail, specifically related to CPAP masks, because this has been an area that is both challenging and scrutinized in audits. According to what we have learned, the order can state “mask or CPAP mask.” However, the type of mask must be supported in the medical record (nasal mask or full-face mask). Suppliers struggle getting correct information documented within the medical record by the physician currently, so it will be tough to get the type of mask documented within the medical record. The best practice is to continue to indicate the type of mask on the order.

Click here to read the current Standard Documentation Requirements. Also, please note that the best practice is to continue gathering the necessary elements on the written orders (do not change orders).

Stay tuned for more information as we learn more.

Please reach out with questions or comments to Ronda Buhrmester at ronda.buhrmester@vgm.com.


TAGS

  1. billing & reimbursement
  2. vgm government

From Our Experts

VGM Government Relations Participates in the Iowa Center for Employee Ownership's (IA-CEO) Day at the Capitol thumbnail VGM Government Relations Participates in the Iowa Center for Employee Ownership's (IA-CEO) Day at the Capitol Alongside Amber Brauner, VGM Group's Compensation and Retirement Director, Adam Miller, Vice President of VGM Government Relations, joined numerous employee owners and advocates from employee-owned businesses (ESOPs) across Iowa for a panel discussion with several state legislators and Iowa's Lieutenant Governor. CMS Updates FAQ On Competitive Bidding Program thumbnail CMS Updates FAQ On Competitive Bidding Program On April 2, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a new FAQ, inclusive of 24 new questions and answers, on the next round of DMEPOS Competitive Bidding Program (CBP) via CBIC, the official information source for bidders and focal point for bidder education. VGM Group Submits Comments on CMS-6098-NC Request for Information (RFI) Related to Comprehensive Regulations to Uncover Suspicious Healthcare (CRUSH). thumbnail VGM Group Submits Comments on CMS-6098-NC Request for Information (RFI) Related to Comprehensive Regulations to Uncover Suspicious Healthcare (CRUSH). The comments reflect VGM Group's support of CMS' goal of strengthening program integrity and shares CMS' commitment to protecting Medicare beneficiaries and taxpayer dollars from fraud, waste, and abuse. DME suppliers already operate in a highly regulated environment and have a direct interest in ensuring that anti-fraud initiatives are precisely targeted, data driven, and operationally feasible, so that legitimate suppliers can continue to serve beneficiaries without unnecessary disruption. Call To Action - Access to Power Seat Elevation on Standard PWCs Threatened thumbnail Call To Action - Access to Power Seat Elevation on Standard PWCs Threatened As reported by NCART: Do you use, recommend or provide power seat elevation for individuals with any of the diagnoses below? If so, and you answer YES to any of the questions below, it is important for Medicare to hear your story in writing by midnight on Saturday, April 4 at PMDRecon@noridian.com. Florida Becomes First State To Follow Medicare; Issues A Six-month Moratorium On DMEPOS Suppliers Enrolling In Medicaid thumbnail Florida Becomes First State To Follow Medicare; Issues A Six-month Moratorium On DMEPOS Suppliers Enrolling In Medicaid As reported by The van Halem Group: On Thursday, March 26, 2026, the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) issued a temporary moratorium on enrollment of new Medicaid providers for Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Supplies (DMEPOS). CMS Rule Phases Out Fax Machines, Snail Mail to Save Taxpayers $781.98 Million a Year thumbnail CMS Rule Phases Out Fax Machines, Snail Mail to Save Taxpayers $781.98 Million a Year As reported by CMS: “The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is slashing wasteful spending and antiquated paperwork by swapping out faxing and mailing for streamlined electronic transactions. This action lets providers spend less time on administrative hassle and more time caring for patients. PAMES Raises Critical Concerns Over Sole-Source Supply Shift thumbnail PAMES Raises Critical Concerns Over Sole-Source Supply Shift PAMES and DME suppliers across Washington are taking an important stand on behalf of both providers and patients. The Tacoma Daily Index recently reported on the state's plan to move to a sole-source contract for incontinence and urological supplies. Under this decision, the Health Care Authority intends to transition all Medicaid recipients to receiving these products from a single vendor. SBA Advocacy: Your Input Matters thumbnail SBA Advocacy: Your Input Matters Make your voice heard about how the CBP has affected your business.