VGM & ASSOCIATESHealthcare MSO
Full Menu Search

Revisions to the Employee Retention Tax Credit Program – May Be Worth a Second Look

Published in Government Relations on August 26, 2022

Craig Douglas

Several changes have occurred with the COVID-19 Employee Retention Credit (ERC) since its inception in 2020. If you or your tax advisor looked at this program when it was created in 2020 and decided that either you didn’t qualify for it or it wasn’t worth pursuing for some other reason, it may be worth taking another look because of the changes made to the program.

When the CARES Act was initially passed, it established the ERC which allowed eligible businesses to qualify for a tax credit if certain criteria were met. It was designed to help employers keep their staff employed, especially if their gross receipts declined by a certain percentage. At first, employers could qualify for a credit of up to $5000 per year for each of their employees based on wages paid between 3/12/2020 and 1/1/2021. They also had to show a 50% decline in gross receipts or have experienced a full or partial shutdown because of government limits on commerce. If they received a Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan, they couldn’t qualify for the ERC.

However, several changes have been made to the program since inception, and it is now easier to qualify for the ERC, and more tax credits are available now than in 2020. A few of the key changes to the program are as follows:

  • The ERC tax credit could be up to $21,000 ($7000 per quarter for the first 3 quarters of 2021) per employee per year instead of the $5,000 that was previously available.
  • Employers now only need to show that they experienced a shutdown or a 20% decline in gross receipts rather than the 50% decline that was required initially.
  • Employers who received a PPP loan are no longer automatically excluded.

It is also worth pointing out that just because you already filed your taxes for 2020 and 2021, and the program technically had an expiration date of 10/1/2021, that does not mean that you can no longer apply for the ERC. Employers have 3 years to determine eligibility, and can retroactively apply for the tax credit at any point during those 3 years. The IRS has created and released a table which helps explain the program, including eligibility requirements and what is available to employers during which date ranges. That chart, as well as other information and resources related to the program, can be found here.

Please consult with your tax advisor to determine the best course of action for your business as it relates to this ERC.

TAGS

  1. covid-19
  2. vgm
  3. vgm government

Get Connected

Stay up-to-date on the latest resources and news provided by VGM & Associates.

Sign Up for Email

From Our Experts

Proposed Rule Suggests Significant Change To Accreditation Process thumbnail Proposed Rule Suggests Significant Change To Accreditation Process The recently released proposed rule CMS-1828-P contains a significant change that could reshape how suppliers navigate accreditation. The rule proposes a major change that would require suppliers to be surveyed and reaccredited annually instead of the current three (3) year cadence. This proposal raises substantial questions about both operational feasibility and cost implications. August Of Action: Your Chance To Connect With Congress thumbnail August Of Action: Your Chance To Connect With Congress It's time to take advantage of August Of Action—a perfect opportunity to make your voice heard. Every summer, federal legislators return to their home states during the Congressional recess. While it gives them a break from Washington D.C., it's primarily a time for them to connect with constituents like you. HR1 Passes House, Advances to President Trump's Desk for Signature thumbnail HR1 Passes House, Advances to President Trump's Desk for Signature After extensive negotiations and partisan debate, the House has officially passed HR1, clearing the path for the bill to be signed into law by President Donald Trump. The legislation, which aims to reduce federal healthcare expenditures, contains several provisions that may impact the durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS) industry. CMS files the Proposed Rule that sheds light on the next round of the Competitive Bidding Program thumbnail CMS files the Proposed Rule that sheds light on the next round of the Competitive Bidding Program On June 30, 2025, CMS filed the anticipated Proposed Rule that includes updates to the Competitive Bidding Program (CBP). Public comments are due 60 days from June 30, 2025. Below is a high-level summary of the rule. It is critical to note that, according to the Proposed Rule Fact Sheet dated June 30, 2025, CMS has stated that they have not announced the specific product categories they are bidding or the specific timeframe for the next competition. Those specifics will be forthcoming in a fu Senate Narrowly Passes HR1, Sending It Back to House for Final Approval thumbnail Senate Narrowly Passes HR1, Sending It Back to House for Final Approval President Donald Trump's sweeping legislative package, formally titled the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act, now referred to as HR1., cleared the Senate today in a dramatic 51–50 vote, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. The bill now returns to the House, where lawmakers must decide whether to adopt the Senate's revised version or negotiate further changes before it can reach the president's desk. Several Prominent Medicaid Provisions in Senate's Budget Bill Deemed in Violation of Byrd Rule thumbnail Several Prominent Medicaid Provisions in Senate's Budget Bill Deemed in Violation of Byrd Rule Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough advised this week that multiple Medicaid provisions in the Senate's reconciliation bill would violate Senate procedure by violating the Byrd Rule. The Byrd Rule is a Senate-specific procedural process that allows Senators to prevent or block inclusion of extraneous provisions in reconciliation bills. Other provisions are still under review. Evaluating the Value of a Payer Contract thumbnail Evaluating the Value of a Payer Contract In our last article, Key Payers Denied Your Application Citing Their Network Is Closed – Now What?, we discussed strategies for addressing payer contracting denials due to a closed network. As indicated, this process can be an extremely time-consuming exercise with no guarantees and mixed results. Below are a few things to consider as you evaluate whether a contract is worth the extra effort. Webinar: Webinar: "Navigating The New CMS Landscape: RADs, HMVs, and Supplier Survival" on June 25 at 1 p.m. CT. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has released its final National Coverage Determination (NCD) for RADs and HMVs used in treating chronic respiratory failure due to COPD. While the rule potentially expands access to bilevel ST therapy (RADs), it also introduces complex compliance requirements, tighter usage criteria, and increased documentation burdens—without additional reimbursement.

Give your business an advantage over the competition.

Become a Member